|Race/Topic (Click to Sort)||Poll||Results||Spread|
|General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein||IBD/TIPP Tracking||Trump 43, Clinton41 Johnson 7, Stein 3||Trump +2|
|General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein||ABC News Tracking||Clinton 50, Trump 38, Johnson 5, Stein 2||Clinton +12|
|General Election: Trump vs. Clinton||IBD/TIPP Tracking||Trump 43, Clinton 42||Trump +1|
|General Election: Trump vs. Clinton||ABC News Tracking||Clinton 53, Trump 41||Clinton +12|
|General Election: Trump vs. Clinton||LA Times/USC Tracking||Clinton 44, Trump 44||Tie|
Real Clear Politics Polls for October 23, 2016: IBD – International Business Daily. Real Clear Politics is the golden standard for accuracy predicting real numbers in the election polls. We now know, through the produced emails, the real Hillary Clinton is very different from her public persona. Mainstream media has also gone out of their way to reflect inaccurate polls, polls that only show Hillary Clinton ahead.
About Natalie Keshing
Polls show majority of women dislike Hillary Clinton and her public image hits record low. Her unpopularity reflects her inability to reassure voters she is trustworthy. The exposed Wikileaks and Judicial Watch emails have opened this criminal case wide open and the public has every reason not to trust her, but most importantly Americans can inform themselves before they go vote. Because the stakes are so critically high, Americans must inform themselves, search their conscience based on their own instincts. The first question voters should ask themselves before voting:
Did Hillary Clinton break the law working on unsecured servers and Blackberries, processing top secret national security information, combining her Secretary of State job with her personal work raising foreign donations for the Clinton Foundation?
Hillary Clinton could be the most unpopular major-party Presidential nominee in modern American history. This is especially true, because she has been a politician in the public eye for 25 years. Working four years as Senator of New York and four years as Secretary of State totaling 8 years working experience. Chris Farrell, from Judicial Watch, Director of Investigation and Research can help you assess and answer this important question, please read the following:
“Mrs. Clinton was the subject of a national security crime investigation. This wasn’t a security review. It wasn’t an argument over classification levels. This was a violation of Title 18 of the US code of section 793F, mishandling national defense information. Contrary to what the American pubic has been told repeatedly, intent is not an element of the crime. There’s no requirement to prove any sort of intent at all. So when FBI Director James Comey talks about intent or he wasn’t able to prove it or there was no sort of specification that showed an intent; it’s a red herring, a false argument it isn’t a requirement of the crime. So we know, from the Inspector General’s intelligence community that 22 top secret SCI which is Sensitive Compartmentive Information, it’s a special category of the intelligence collection. Twenty Two (22) top secret SCI messages or emails went across Mrs. Clinton’s unsecured server. It’s a fact, it’s a finding of the Inspector General. That’s the root of the referral to the Department of Justice that caused them to begin this inquiry. The fact that that has occurred, puts the United States at grave risk. That’s the definition for compromising top secret material. That is the issue, that is really the focal point of what the FBI should have been looking at and it’s a YES or NO question. It’s not, what did you intend? It’s not, how did you feel about it? It’s not, what were you trying to accomplish? It’s a YES or NO question. Did this event occur? Yes or No. And if it did occur, who is responsible for it? What is the proximate cause of this event occurring and if you walk it back to find the person who made it happen, that’s who’s prosecuted. This whole intent thing, is nonsense. Mr. James Comey, FBI Director is lying to the American public when he goes down that path.
So when you look at the track record, at pattern of behavior, at the conduct of the vulnerabilities that have been exposed through this entire scandal; the American public is being misled and they are being misled in a very deliberate fashion, which is not just disturbing from a factual basis, but is deeply corrosive of the public’s understanding of what’s been put at risk by Mrs. Clinton and her conduct.