License to kill
![]() |
Thereâs no doubt about it: the vaccine companies have a license to kill. They can kill as many people as they want and nobody in America is going to stop them. Itâs all perfectly legal.
![]() |
The most frustrating thing about this pandemic is that there is no doubt that the drug companies have killed over 150,000 Americans, yet nobody with authority to stop these vaccines wants to talk about the evidence. The vaccine program is done under the pretext of saving 10,000 lives (the Pfizer Phase 3 trial showed the drug saved approximately one COVID life for every 22,000 people fully vaccinated for the COVID variants existing over 1 year ago), but nobody really wants to look at the excess all-cause mortality caused by the vaccines (aka âthe collateral damageâ).
Is there a viable cause of action to stop any of this? I havenât found it.
The law shields the drug companies, and everyone associated with the vaccination process from all liability. They basically have a license to kill.
The CDC should be criminally negligent for not recognizing the obvious safety signals. However, because they are an authority in the minds of the court, they can do no wrong. There is a âreasonable minds may differâ defense here and our courts believe that the CDC has reasonable minds. So how can there be negligence when reasonable minds donât find a safety signal? Itâs the perfect crime. You can literally get away with murder.
People are being killed but nobody is being charged with a crime, AFAIK. Are there any district attorneys or state or federal prosecutors that can find a viable cause of action?
The evidence
The evidence of harm has been hiding in plain sight including:
-
An estimated reportable adverse event rate of 20% of those fully vaccinated (there are over 200M vaccinated, 1M VAERS reports and VAERS is at least 41X underreported)
-
Embalmers reporting up to 93% of cases have telltale blood clots associated with the vaccine
-
Blood before/after vaccination is visually very different
-
Rates of myocarditis as high as 2% (Monte Vista Christian School and a private conversation with a DoD doctor)
-
Rates of neurological damage as high as 4.5% (Israeli MOH survey).
-
A minimum of 30% (Peter Schirmacherâs study) to 93% (Bhakdiâs study) of deaths post vaccine attributed to the vaccine
-
A post-marketing survey disclosed by Pfizer that is pretty consistent with the VAERS data reports (Iâll write a separate substack on this later, but I didnât see any smoking gun that isnât already in VAERS where we already knew about thousands of adverse event types).
-
An estimate of deaths and URF by Joel Smalley using death data in Massachusetts that confirms earlier numbers. Joel calculated a URF of 41, matching mine exactly! He also calculated a deaths per million doses (dpmd) of 945 which is even higher than the 411 dpmd calculated by Mathew Crawford.
-
The Skidmore paper, âHow Many People Died from the Covid-19 Inoculations? An Estimate Based on a Survey of the United States Population,â which estimated 294,000 excess deaths from the vaccine.
-
German insurance company data estimate done by Mathew Crawfordyielding an estimate of 120,000 deaths in the US caused by the vaccines
- Troubling anecdotal reports
More recently, we now also have evidence of reverse transcription in vitro which is troubling because the CDC assured us that this could not happen. We donât know the in vivo rates. In plain English, in test tube experiments, part of the gene sequence from the vaccine is getting sent back into our DNA which is extremely troubling to everyone because that wasnât supposed to happen. It is important to note that we are not yet seeing the actual transposition of spike DNA into the host/human genome where this can permanently alter the human genome (and likely not in a good way). For more on this, see this comment from BC.
Rather than halt the vaccines while this is being investigated, we of course do the opposite and encourage or mandate additional booster doses. Itâs even more tragic when it is being done to our kids by their schools and universities (they call it âprotectingâ our kids).
One final data point is that I have an open bet of $1M that over 1,000 people have been killed by these vaccines making them officially the most deadly vaccine in US history and too unsafe to use.
The point of the bet is to show that nobody in the world has any confidence at all that the vaccines are really safe. Otherwise, theyâd take my money on a âsure thingâ bet.
How do we hold these people criminally liable?
It seems pretty clear that the people in charge are never going to voluntarily stop killing people.
Is there a way to hold these people criminally liable? That seems to be our best option.
It will take a mass re-education, and that seems hard since the mainstream media is dedicated to supporting the false narrative.
We have to redpill millions of people: here are a few ways to do that
I learned something on Thursday from a concierge doctor which was mind-blowing to me: re-education is possible. She was single-handedly able to redpill 96% of her patient base and put them on the right road (the other 4% decided to leave the practice). The fastest re-education took just 90 minutes of âIâm here to answer all your questions about what Iâve just told you about the vaccines.â The longest took many hours.
The effort was successful for two reasons:
-
She has credentials as a trusted healthcare professional (a doctor), and
-
there was a pre-existing trust relationship (the doctor was redpilling her own patients, not someone elseâs patients).
The second part was critical to her success. She doesnât know how critical it was because itâs not like other doctors are calling her up and asking her to redpill their patients.
So thatâs one approach, mass educate doctors, and have the doctors redpill their patients.
A second approach is to focus on redpilling key medical thought leaders who have some critical thinking skills left.
A third approach is to redpill large audiences that can drive change. I think college campuses like Harvard, Stanford, MIT, etc. are potential candidates for this approach. Weâll have to try this a few times and see what happens.
I can tell you that most kids on college campuses are bluepilled on this issue. If you reach out to most any student newspaper on this topic, you will be unlikely to get a return call. If you call the Chicago Thinker and get lucky enough to talk to a redpilled staffer like Eden Negussie or Daniel Schmidt, youâll get a warm reception (about 50% of the staff there is redpilled). If you call the establishment student newspaper (The Chicago Maroon) and talk to Irene Qi, youâre wasting your time and hers.
A fourth approach is to create a new alt media channel focused on exposing stories that the mainstream media refuses to accurately report. It could incorporate voices from sources such as Sharyl Attkisson, Kim Iversen, The Highwire, The Epoch Times, The Expose, The Stew Peters Show, etc. I love Sharylâs tagline: UNTOUCHABLE SUBJECTS. FEARLESS, NONPARTISAN REPORTING. Exactly! We need a whole network like this.
A fifth approach is to hold public officials accountable and expose them publicly as damaging the public health by pushing the vaccine, masking, etc. This is nearly impossible for the average person to do because these public officials never answer any questions at all from the public they serve. Even US Senator Ron Johnson canât get CDC Director Rochelle Walensky to answer a few simple questions. Most city council members are deferential to the local public health official and never ask any hard questions.
The way we win this is not from a single idea or strategy. Itâs from all of us getting involved to make a difference in our community. There are millions of us and these are just a few ideas.
What are you doing today to make a difference?
Youâre a free subscriber to Steve Kirsch’s newsletter. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber.