NewsJustIn while KeepingUInformed here on natswritings.com 

The Damage of Hillary’s E-mail Cover Up: 

Goldman Sachs > Hillary Clinton > Son-In-Law’s Company

When it comes to politics and Wall Street, Goldman Sachs not only paid Hillary Clinton hundreds of thousands of dollars for her “private” (secretive) speeches, they also invested probably a lot more money in Hillary Clinton’s son-in-law’s company. Well these kinds of deals aren’t even six degrees apart. Now we find out that not only will she owe a great favor to Goldman Sachs for her “private” (secretive) speeches but probably more than above and beyond anything legal. I suspect that the heads of Goldman Sachs are pretty sure they stand first in line for Hillary Clinton to protect them, cover up for them, help them in way, shape, or form. But wait a minute didn’t we already do that in September, 2008. The bailout costing over a trillion dollars.

It was a very well known secret to some of the officials and government employees in Washington that Hillary was doing her job as Secretary of State through a personal computer that had absolutely no firewall protection in any way, shape, or form. Let’s think about this matter in all it’s seriousness. The State Department IG put out the report that Hillary Clinton “did not comply” with the federal rules and regulations. Not only did she not comply, but she concealed this, and presented a great threat this country’s national security. What classified documents on foreign policy were compromised against our national security. This is corruption, incompetence, and shameless dissoluteness. She is still running for “President” after all this. Think about the damage she will do this country if she is elected for president. Is Donald Trump correct? “Crooked Hillary”

Ah! now the answer why the former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed this. Because any logical, common sense, trustworthy person would never had the arrogance to commit such a serious violation against this country’s classified intelligence security. On the National Review written by Andrew C. McCarthy I found the answer.

“Arrogance in setting up a homebrew communications network; an outrageous violation of the transparency standards that were her responsibility as Secretary of State to enforce. It was a familiar exercise in Clintonion self-dealing; Anticipating running for president in 2016, she realized she was enmeshed in the Clinton Foundation’s global scheme to sell influence for money, so she devised a way to avoid a paper trail. No one who goes to such lengths to circumvent our laws is fit to be trusted with their faithful execution and our country’s national security.”

And there it is, the answer we all needed to know. One cover up for another cover up until the black hole of greed, need for power, disloyal, untrustworthy, and basically didn’t give a damn about this country’s national security.

Now the question is what is the State Department’s IG office’s next move? Their responsibility is not only to conduct an investigation and submit their report but to uphold the law of federal rules and regulations, the constitution, and the country’s national security. How do we prevent this person from being elected President of the United States?

Clinton Foundation’s Global Scheme > Clinton’s E-mail Cover Up > Goldman Sachs > Hillary Clinton’s Paid Speeches > Son-In-Law’s Company > ??? What Else.

Andrew C. McCarthy’s excellent article from the National Review titled “Hilliary’s E-mail Recklessness Compromised Our National Security. He adds:

“There is a graver issue: the damage Clinton has done to our national defense, the havoc she has wrought in our intelligence community – the 17 agencies that spend tens of billions of our dollars annually to collect and, crucially, to protect the secrets on which our security depends. What could a hostile government or terror network do with that information? Will they kill an intelligence agent who has been outed? What about operatives the agent has been running – who must then be pulled out to avoid arrest, or worse? Even if our spies are sage, their operation must be considered blown, along with arrangements on which the operation relied – cooperating businesses, bank accounts, safe houses, drop boxes, etc.”

Hillary Clinton also stated that Bill Clinton her husband would continue to run the Bill Clinton Foundation while she was president and she would put him in charge of the United States economy? This would be a huge conflict of interest. I can imagine all sorts of scenarios playing out in these dire circumstances should she be elected as president.

“This is more than a “mistake”, more than a “violation”, this is a breach of security at the highest level and a cover up.” © Natalie Keshing

Clinton blames her staff.

Hillary Clinton Won’t Say How Much Goldman Sachs CEO Invested With Her Son-in-Law