Twice Hillary Clinton has Overthrown Dictators in Iraq and Libya 261 Hits

©Natalie Keshing
Editor-in-Chief
NatsWritings.com

Twice Hillary Clinton as Senator of New York and Secretary of State Has Overthrown Dictators in Iraq and Libya: “Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.”

As America came to know the truth, it was extremely alarming and difficult to understand why four top government officials stationed in Benghazi, Libya among the chaos that had already erupted from an overthrown dictatorship placed Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods in harms way. They did not have the adequate amount of security military personnel to protect them on that fateful night on September 11, 2012. All lost their lives as a direct result of Hillary Clinton’s absence and ignoring repeated calls for help from Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Ultimately, this blatant move and risk to overthrow the dictatorship in Libya, which was not supported by Vice President Joe Biden proved incapable of bringing peace and order to Libya. ISIS very quickly infiltrated the region and expanded their militia groups into Libya, while the wealthy monarchs in the Persian Gulf remained largely unshaken by these events. In the end this strongman’s overthrow of a dictatorship led to chaos and the death of four Americans who were killed by terrorists in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012. After the tragedy in Benghazi, Libya it was revealed just how bad things were. Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State couldn’t protect four brave American men in Benghazi, Libya on 9/11/2012, she couldn’t protect a nation as President of the United States.

It was a recipe for disaster knowing that the U.S. Intelligence infrastructure and administration was available to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, especially on that fateful night in Benghazi, Libya. She did not consult with US Intelligence sources, nor did she inform the appropriate officials to send in more security military protection. Especially in lieu and considering Libya was still suffering the pains of pandemonium and chaos from an overthrown dictatorship.

Hillary Clinton continued to rely and take advice from Sidney Blumenthal who had become her covert foreign policy adviser with no experience on foreign policy. She didn’t do her job because her priority was to continually involve herself in “pay for play” schemes with foreign donors. That was her first priority to continue to raise money and donate to the Clinton Foundation.

Gregory N. Hicks, a Foreign Service Officer for the State Department, couldn’t have described the grave magnitude, risk and in harms way Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans would face on September 11, 2012. Knowing in their last hour, even minutes, that it didn’t have to be the way this was going down. All that they faced in those last desperate moments with no hope; knowing they were breathing their last breaths.

Cheryl Mills, Hillary’s Chief of Staff at the State Department. Who also worked for the Clinton Foundation at the same time. Her central role, determining which emails would be publicly disclosed. She was granted immunity by the FBI. The Justice Department allowed Cheryl Mills a witness, if not a subject of the Clinton email investigation to invoke attorney-client privilege on behalf of Hillary Clinton. Cheryl Mills also attempted to silence the congressional testimony of State Department whistleblower Gregory N. Hicks in the Benghazi-gate scandal.

Patrick Kennedy is the Undersecretary of State for Management. He has been directly involved, if not at the very center of the biggest scandals of Hillary Clinton’s State Department. Patrick Kennedy also made the fateful decision that reduced professional American security personnel assigned to Tripoli from 34 to 6, with tragic consequences for Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glenn Doherty and Ty Woods. His latest scandal as a senior State Department official is that he proposed a ‘quid pro quo’ to convince the FBI to strip the classification on an email from Hillary Clinton’s server. He repeatedly tried to influence the FBI’s decision when his offer was denied even taking his plea up the chain of command, according to newly released FBI documents.

Now the truth supports these facts in the following:

“More than half of the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was serving as secretary of state gave money to the Clinton Foundation, either personally or through companies or groups according to a review of State Department calendars released to the Associated Press. At least 85 of the 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to the documents obtained by the AP.“

“The evidence is clear – it’s time a special prosecutor be appointed to investigate the growing proof of pay-to-play at Hillary Clinton’s State Department,” he said in a statement. “This is among the strongest and most unmistakable pieces of evidence of what we’ve long suspected: at Hillary Clinton’s State Department, access to the most sensitive policy makers in U.S. diplomacy was for sale to the highest bidder.”

For Hillary Clinton it is now two major lessons she did NOT learn: 1) When she voted yes as Senator of New York and agreed with Republican President George W. Bush to overthrow Saddam Hussein’s regime; 2) When Secretary of State and President Obama decided to overthrow another dictator Muammar al-Gaddafi in Libya. Against those who were opposed inside President Obama’s administration.

The people that live in these “Prison Countries” like Iraq and Libya have lived under complete control almost their entire lives. They have been brainwashed and threatened to live by and under the rule of only a dictatorship. They have no concept of freedom and they are more vulnerable to the evils of criminal activity. The end result after ruthless rulers are taken out of power will always erupt into complete pandemonium and chaos in these “Prison Countries”.

Groups will almost immediately form in a frenzy with their new found freedom. Like prisoners they are finally out of prison. The poor socioeconomic circumstances where there are high numbers of men without a job, hope and purpose join these radical groups almost immediately and these groups are not ISIS. Those promising to join a group to protect their own families from the chaos, looting, and dangerous threats from others who are still trying to maintain old policies and the vision of an overthrown dictatorship. Then the current military in these countries are left without a Commander in Chief now trying to control the complete chaos erupting everywhere, especially in those cities that are most populated. The villages and smaller towns are less affected and maybe safer from the chaos and danger.

Then you add to the mix the radial jihadist group ISIS who have already been and started brainwashing through social media young directionless men’s mind even before the “Prison countries” dictatorship is overthrown. ISIS has already trained these vulnerable young men’s minds “To be ready”. ISIS follows the news media very closely. They have operative spies in various Muslim countries who continually monitor the vulnerability of a dictatorship of a “Prison Country”; waiting for their opportunity to infiltrate and spread like “Red Ants In Secret Cells”.

Through the Clinton Foundation one of the largest donors was Saudi Arabia donating 25,000,000 million dollars. It might even be more. Many are questioning “Why did Saudi Arabia donate twenty five million dollars to the Clinton Foundation and for what?” These kinds of questions involve researching and following a paper trail on the history of foreign policy. Such as “The Arab Spring” When Colonel Gaddafi threatened to crush the Arab Spring protests in Libya Hillary Clinton helped persuade President Obama to join other countries in bombing Colonel Gaddafi’s forces to “Prevent a Feared Massacre”? Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen entered an uncertain transition period, Syria and Libya were drawn into a civil conflict, while the wealthy monarchies in the Persian Gulf remained largely unshaken by the events. The use of the term the “Arab Spring” has since been criticized for being inaccurate and simplistic.

“The Arab Spring was a series of anti-government protests, uprisings and armed rebellions that spread across the Middle East in early 2011 (The same time Libya rebels were uprising Maummar Gaddifi’s dictatorship. ©Natalie Keshing). But their purpose, relative success and outcome remain hotly disputed in Arab countries, among foreign observers, and between world powers looking to cash in on the changing map of the Middle East.” (Those world powers like Hillary Clinton Secretary of State, maybe Saudi Arabia donors now that in Libya the gold mines and the third largest producer of oil was now available but in chaos. ©Natalie Keshing)

“2011 Arab Uprisings: Why the Name the “Arab Spring”? The term “Arab Spring” was popularized by the Western media in early 2011, when the successful uprising in Tunisia against former leader Zine El Abidine Ben Ali emboldened similar anti-government protests in most Arab countries.”

Printed on March 3, 2016 The New York Times reported “The Libya Gamble: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Push for War & the Making of a Failed State.”

“The New York Times has published a major two-part exposé titled “The Libya Gamble” on how then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton pushed President Obama to begin bombing Libya five years ago this month; March 1, 2011. Today, Libya is a failed state and a haven for terrorists. How much should Hillary Clinton be blamed for the crisis? We speak to journalist Scott Shane of The New York Times.”

“NERMEEN SHAIKH: Five years ago this month, the United States and allied nations began bombing Libya, striking forces loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. The Obama administration said the strikes were needed to enforce a no-fly zone and to protect Libyan protesters who took to the streets as part of the Arab Spring. Inside the Obama administration, there was a deep division over whether the U.S. should intervene militarily. One of the most hawkish members of Obama’s Cabinet was Hillary Clinton, then the secretary of state.”

JO BECKER: Hillary Clinton’s role in the military intervention that ousted Muammar Gaddafi in Libya is getting new scrutiny as she runs for president. The U.S. relationship with Libya has long been complicated. Colonel Gaddafi, who ruled from 1969 until 2011, was an eccentric dictator linked to terrorism. Still, when he gave up his nuclear program a decade ago and provided information about al-Qaeda, he became an ally of sorts. In 2009, when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, she welcomed one of Colonel Gaddafi’s sons to Washington.

SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON: We deeply value the relationship between the United States and Libya.

JO BECKER: But two years later, when Colonel Gaddafi threatened to crush the Arab Spring protests in Libya, she helped persuade President Obama to join other countries in bombing his forces to prevent a feared massacre.

SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON: This operation has already saved many lives, but the danger is far from over.

JO BECKER: The military campaign ended up ousting Colonel Gaddafi, and Secretary Clinton was welcomed to Libya on a victory tour. A few days later, Colonel Gaddafi was killed by opposition fighters.

SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON: We came, we saw, he died.

JO BECKER: But the new Western-backed government proved incapable of uniting Libya. And in the end, the strongman’s death led to chaos. When four Americans were killed by terrorists in Benghazi in 2012, it revealed just how bad things had gotten. Colonel Gaddafi’s huge arsenal of weapons has shown up in the hands of terrorists in places like Gaza, Syria, Nigeria and Mali. Hundreds of thousands of migrants have fled through Libya on boats. Many have drowned. And the power vacuum has allowed ISIS to build its most dangerous outpost on the Libyan coast. Today, just 300 miles from Europe, Libya is a failed state. Meanwhile, back at home, Mrs. Clinton has struggled to defend the decision to intervene.

HILLARY CLINTON: But I’m not giving up on Libya, and I don’t think anybody should. We’ve been at this a couple of years.

Now in a very desperate attempt Hillary and Bill Clinton have offered to stop taking foreign donations into the Clinton Foundation; already admitting their crimes against the United States Constitution, violation of the Espionage Act 793F, and fraud against the Charity Fraud Solicitation Law. The fact remains is that Hillary Clinton will not stop these crimes if she is elected as President. She is a criminal and incorrigible.