©Natalie Keshing
Editor-in-Chief
http://www.natswritings.com
About Natalie Keshing
Former FBI Director James Comey’s Testimony of Self Preservation, Perjury and Obstruction of Justice
Talking point: Former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony on June 8, 2017 to the Senate Intelligence Committee.
According to Comey’s testimony, Loretta Lynch directed him as FBI Director to call Hillary’s investigation a “matter”.
A “matter” and this didn’t give former FBI Director James Comey cause to write this information down and search his moral compass and responsibility to say to Loretta Lynch, “No, this is an investigation, and I’m not here to protect you, Obama and the Clinton’s criminal corruption.”
Instead, Comey was knee high in the swamp of political corruption and he was working against an incoming President to protect the former President of all kinds of deep infiltrated corruption including spying and unmasking President Trump’s staff during the campaign and after President Trump had won.
Comey wrote privileged information in memos each time he met with President Trump. He then leaked this information to Daniel Richman, a Columbia Law Professor, who leaked these government owned classified memos which were part of an ongoing investigation to the press. The former FBI Director James Comey violated the law and this is a clear obstruction of justice. From there, Robert Mueller was assigned as Special Counsel to lead the Russia and Trump investigation. Robert Mueller is also a very close friend of James Comey.
Comey perjured himself in today’s testimony. He indirectly admitted he was colluding with the former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Barack Obama protecting former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Mr. Comey’s disclosures depend on who he is protecting; Hillary Clinton, Loretta Lynch, Barack Obama or himself. When Loretta Lynch and James Comey were treating Hillary Clinton’s investigation as a “matter” and not an “investigation”, this was another obstruction of justice.
Because of Comey’s collusion with Lynch and Obama, his recommendation to the Department of Justice was to not recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton.
His intent, his decision, his political collusion and his inability to read Hillary Clinton her Miranda Rights and not polygraph her, or obtain a search warrant to search Clinton’s two homes from top to bottom, clearly demonstrated he was not the person to be FBI Director. Therefore President Trump made a clear and right choice to fire him.
If this was a “matter” and not an “investigation” to Comey and Loretta Lynch, then Comey had no business trying to appear he was investigating the Hillary Clinton case.
He should have recused himself because he was already compromised in this case going along with Loretta Lynch’s obstruction of justice after secretly meeting with Bill Clinton, the husband of the person who was supposed to be investigated according to Title 18 The Espionage Act 793f.
Everyone involved in this criminal conspiracy broke the law. From a former President who was spying and unmasking an incoming President which is an act of treason, to an Attorney General who met with Bill Clinton at an airport to Comey cowardly abiding by their diabolical political corruption.
Comey should have disclosed this information before July 5, 2016. Not rampantly rushing to judgement and committing an act of obstruction of justice on behalf of protecting the Clintons and former President Barack Obama.
When former FBI Director James Comey announced to the American public on July 5, 2016 referring to Hillary Clinton’s disturbing pattern of criminal behavior and calling it “carelessness”. He failed to disclose that as Vice-President of Lockheed Martin, his former employer, he negotiated with Hillary Clinton on numerous contracts that were awarded to Lockheed Martin by the State Department for arms sales.
Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State in the State Department approved $165 billion dollars worth of commercial arms sales. This was an immense amount of arms sales to foreign countries who turned around and donated money to the Clinton Foundation from 2010 through 2012. This was another conflict of interest and former FBI Director James Comey should have recused himself as FBI Director investigating Hillary Clinton’s email scandal.
Most of his testimony was self preservation and he certainly didn’t do himself any favors.
Natalie Keshing
“Here’s what we learned today from James Comey’s testimony: The president of the United States never obstructed justice, and in fact encouraged the FBI director to go forward with any and all investigations into campaign associates’ potential involvement with Russia.”
“And we learned that James Comey is a political hack.”
“Comey confirmed several times that the president and the White House did not ask him to stop the Russia investigation. Comey said multiple times that President Trump was not and never was under investigation. Why the FBI director couldn’t have come out sooner to lift this cloud remains unclear.”
“We also learned that Comey was selectively leaking information to the press to try and damage the president. What so-called champion of law and justice would ever do that to the president of the United States?”
“But the biggest news out of Comey’s testimony was the indictment of the Obama administration and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Comey admitted that Lynch was able to pressure him into toning down his own language when speaking publicly about Hillary Clinton’s email investigation. Wow!”