No Legal Consequences for Hunter Biden Laptop Censorship: William Barr

From The Epoch Times By Naveen Athrappully April 30, 2022 and Nats.news

Natalie’s Commentary: It’s uncanny and inappropriate for former Attorney General William Barr to flat out say and negate, “that those who dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation and suppressed the news will not be held accountable with any legal consequences.”

It appears Barr is using his influence and continuing to talk to those currently in the Department of Justice and the FBI who would be responsible in taking legal action in accordance with the oath they took to upheld the law written in the Constitution of the United States to address the rampant and insidious crime and corruption in the federal law enforcement government agencies.

Especially, those executives in mainstream media at (ABC, CBS, and NBC) who were obviously complicit and culpable in colluding to protect the Biden family syndicate.

Social media like Twitter in 2020 before the Presidential election took place, purposely suppressed a national story of crime and corruption involving the son of the nominee Joe Biden by stopping and closing the New York Post Twitter account from exposing Hunter Biden’s laptop that contained specific evidence of Hunter’s and Joe Biden’s pay2play dealings with Burisma Holdings and China’s CCP. Hunter’s laptop and it’s contents was authenticated.

A recent report by content analysis and media watchdog Media Research Center reported social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram had censored and deleted 646 accounts or posts that criticized Joe Biden between March 2020 and March 2022.

This has led illegitimate President Biden and his administration to create a Disinformation Governance Board. Congress is trying to defund such an outright illegal action censoring freedom of speech at a national level. At the very least this is Orwellian. Where George Orwell describes a totalitarian future in his anti utopian novel “1984”. One of the government departments in the Orwell’s novel was called Ministry of Truth where people are now comparing it to the Disinformation Governance Board. Nina Jankowicz born in 1988 is only 34-years-of-age, who has surprisingly been appointed by the Biden administration as the Executive Director of Disinformation Governance Board. She was a full bright fellow working with the Ukrainian  Foreign Ministry.

Another report released by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society at a press conference exposed Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife made $419.5 million in contributions to non-profit organizations during the 2020 election cycle–$350 million to the “Safe Elections” Project of the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and another $69.5 million to the Center for Election Innovation and Research. That improperly influenced the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party.

Another example of how not only your regular poor criminal or illegal immigrant criminal men but elites like Mark Zuckerberg can get away with so much that is adding to the breakdown of societal norms and law and order to keep us safe and prevent another massive election heist like in the 2020 Presidential election.

Ken Blackwell does a phenomenal job summarizing and exposing some of the lengthy details that took place when Mark Zuckerberg and his wife improperly influenced the 2020 presidential election on behalf of Joe Biden. It’s really a shame that Mark Zuckerberg wasn’t held accountable.”  Ken Blackwell: The Greatest Electoral Heist in American History

Report: Mark Zuckerberg’s $419 Million Non-Profit Contributions ‘Improperly Influenced 2020 Presidential Election’

~ Natalie

Former Attorney General William Barr recently made it clear that those who dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation and suppressed the news will not be held accountable with any legal consequences.

“None that I can think of,” Barr said to Newsmax host Sean Spicer who raised the question regarding accountability. The former AG noted that media and politicians have a propensity for telling lies. Speaking in an interview with conservative radio show host Hugh Hewitt last month, Barr suggested that suppressing the laptop story might have affected the 2020 presidential elections.

“The intelligence officials suggesting that it was Russian disinformation in order to essentially keep a cork in it until after the election. I do think that that, given how close the election was, you know, I think that that probably affected the outcome, or at least is a very distinct probability of that,” Barr said.

Just weeks before the 2020 election, the New York Post published an article about a laptop dropped off at a Delaware repair shop in 2019 that is alleged to have belonged to Hunter Biden.

The article pointed to several emails and messages received and sent by Hunter Biden that triggered accusations that he leveraged his father’s influence as a former American vice president to secure lucrative business deals in Ukraine and China.

Following the New York Post article, 51 former U.S. spy officials signed a letter suggesting that the laptop story carried Russian ties. Subsequently, Joe Biden’s campaign and several media outlets dismissed the issue as a Russian disinformation operation.

In recent months, media outlets like the Washington Post, Politico, and New York Times have published reports indicating that at least some of the contents on the laptop are authentic.

During the second presidential debate in October 2020, Joe Biden had blamed the story about his son’s laptop on a “Russian plot.” Barr recently stated that he was “very disturbed” when Biden lied about the issue to the American people.

The former attorney general also remained silent when Hunter Biden was put under investigation by federal authorities over tax issues before the 2020 presidential election. Former President Donald Trump had expressed disappointment at Barr’s decision, insisting that his silence had resulted in a disadvantage for the Republican Party at the polls.

When the New York Post tried to post the story on its social media accounts back in 2020, Twitter and Facebook blocked the reach of the article. Twitter even locked the account of the media outlet for more than two weeks, arguing that it contained personal material.

Entrepreneur Elon Musk, who is taking over Twitter in a $44 billion deal, has criticized the censorship by the platform. “Suspending the Twitter account of a major news organization for publishing a truthful story was obviously incredibly inappropriate,” he said in an April 27 tweet.

According to a recent report by content analysis and media watchdog Media Research Center, social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram had censored or deleted 646 accounts or posts that criticized Joe Biden between March 2020 and March 2022.

“The worst cases of censorship involved platforms targeting anyone who dared to speak about any subject related to the New York Post bombshell Hunter Biden story,” the watchdog said. Of the 646 cases, 140 were about the New York Post’s articles on Hunter Biden and his alleged corrupt foreign business dealings.