Until recently, the Clinton Foundation has been monitored by the IRS, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and multiple state government authorities that are seeded with persons loyal to either the Clintons or the Obamas.
It appears investigative authorities may finally be conducting a “real audit” to answer tough questions about the missing or false public filings of the Clinton Foundation “charities” inside and outside the United States. “When these powerful organizations engage motivated minds, they will wish to concentrate on a few areas that have long gone begging for attention.” They can easily compare and get ahead of the curve with the real financial analysis at charlesortel.com. There was extensive painstaking work performed by Mr. Ortel trying to get to the bottom of the “Slush Fund”.
The first time the Clinton Foundation was investigated was between 2001 and 2005. Then FBI Director Robert Mueller, yes, the same Robert Mueller Special Counsel investigating the fake Trump-Russian collusion, and then-Deputy Attorney General James Comey did not find violations of the Charity Fraud Solicitation Law; covering for the Slush Foundation for years. There were others like New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman who did not investigate the Clinton Foundation. Where there was obvious and escalating fraud in a supposed presidential library complex in Little Rock, Arkansas, which also “fought HIV/AIDS internationally” from unregistered offices in New York and Massachusetts without ever obtaining required audits of worldwide activities.
“Strangely, as the first investigation wound down, evidence in the public domain suggests that the Clinton Foundation also defrauded the National Archivist by making demonstrably false representations in a binding legal agreement.”
“For example, there is no evidence the IRS provided final approval to the Clinton Foundation to “fight HIV/AIDS internationally” as a tax-exempt purpose by Nov. 18, 2004, the date the presidential archive was officially donated.
That Nov. 18, 2004, agreement is nowhere to be found today on the Clinton Foundation website and in public filings despite the charity’s more than 13 years of widespread solicitation across state and national boundaries using telephones, mail, and the internet.”
“The next major investigation started in December 2009 when the French government launched a detailed look into UNITAID, a multilateral international organization — primarily funded by France — that has sent more than $650 million to arms of the Clinton Foundation engaged, at least in theory, in fighting HIV and AIDS.”
“Reports concerning this investigation, written in French and published in 2010 and 2011, show that French government authorities, like their U.S. counterparts, missed the heart of the problem posed by the Clinton Foundation.”
“The foundation, by its own description, started soliciting funding for its fight against HIV and AIDS early in 2002, though its authorized charitable status didn’t change until March 2004, after the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative Inc. was officially recognized on March 24, 2004, in Arkansas.”
“Applications made to the IRS, to various states and to foreign governments for tax exemption and solicitation rights to pursue this radically different mission, are not available on the central portal operated by the Clinton Foundation, nor forthcoming, yet, from the governments concerned.”
Federal tax filings for this entity for the partial year in 2004 and for 2005 aren’t available on the Clinton Foundation website, perhaps because they show substantial activities that seem to fall far outside tax-exempt purposes approved by the IRS.
It is important to take notice that the IRS remained silent and abetted the Clinton Foundation to continue its destructive course. ~ Natalie
“In addition, these and other tax filings fail to explain payments to members of the Clinton family for services received and for reimbursement of expenses by donors to the Clinton Foundation.”
“Even though there is no public record that the Clinton Foundation ever was authorized to control a supposed charity “fighting HIV/AIDS internationally,” the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative Inc. was supposedly liquidated as of Dec. 31, 2005, with all of its worldwide activities and obligations supposedly taken over by the parent foundation. There is no evidence in the public domain that the merger was lawfully completed in each U.S. state and foreign country in which either entity operated.”
From 2006 through 2009, the Clinton Foundation solicited funds and received a majority of its growing revenues, in theory, to fight HIV and AIDS internationally. Required audits were not prepared to strict U.S. requirements.
“Moreover, versions of these audits on the Clinton Foundation website exclude key “combining” statements that show for 2007 through 2009 just how substantial HIV- and AIDS-specific financial amounts are compared to the combined total. The Clinton Foundation attempted to reorganize in 2009, but available public filings could place multiple individuals in significant legal jeopardy.”
For example, claims made to the IRS in applications for federal tax exemption on Form 1023, under penalties of perjury, are false and materially misleading concerning numerous entities created after Sept. 4, 2009, to carry on unauthorized activities in which the Clinton Foundation had been engaged starting in 2002.
To get to the heart of the vexing problems that allowed the largest unprosecuted charity frauds ever attempted to flourish from January 2001 forward, one must ask many questions of central figures in federal, state and foreign governments.
How did Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, while U.S. attorney in Maryland, miss the fact that the Clinton Foundation was promoting use of potentially adulterated HIV and AIDS drugs from October 2003 forward.
How did Rosenstein miss obvious errors in the Clinton Foundation tax filings for 2010 (originally submitted in 2011 with amended versions submitted in 2015) concerning a $37.1 million donation to the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund at a P.O. Box address in Baltimore, Maryland, that was never declared, as required, in key states like New York?
Why did Rosenstein (and many other officials, including New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman), fail to require Laureate Education and the Clinton Foundation to explain how they organized the “Clinton Global Initiative University” and why the Clinton Foundation tax filings for 2010 through 2016 don’t explain what Bill Clinton did for the $17.6 million he was paid as part-time chancellor while he held key roles at the Clinton Foundation?
Improper donations to the Clinton Foundation funded by Australian taxpayers:
In another twist of the plot to expose Hillary’s pattern of criminal behavior, an Australian investigative journalist who is a retired police detective said he has been asked to provide the FBI with details about multiple allegations of mishandling millions of dollars contributed to the Clinton Foundation by the Aussie government. “I have been asked to provide the FBI with further and better particulars about allegations regarding improper donations to the Clinton Foundation funded by Australian taxpayers,” Michael Smith told LifeZette.
At the center of Smith’s complaints are former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, and multiple Australian government officials, including senior diplomat Alexander Downer, that government’s high commissioner to the United Kingdom.
Joseph Rago certainly not a corrupted person but was a Wall Street Journal editor and a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter trying to get to the bottom of one story that continued with it’s alarming facts to bother Joseph Rago’s good conscience.
Rago was investigating Hillary Clinton’s involvement in the 2014 sale of Veropharm (Russias largest medical company) to the American medical giant Abbott Laboratories. How could a Russian pharmaceutical firm been purchased in 2014 by an American pharmaceutical firm while there were sanctions placed/imposed on Russia. Well, we already know that Hillary Clinton doesn’t follow federal government rules or international policy and law enforcement.
The crux of the investigation was how Hilary Clinton as Secretary of State contributed to finalizing this pay for play transaction scheme. Husband Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 for giving a speech in Moscow.
Rago was scheduled to meet with the Russian Consulate General’s office in New York City on July 20, 2017 with Honorable Igor L. Golubovskiy. The meeting with the Russian Consulate official was to investigate and verify important documents Rago had obtained during his investigation. Rago never showed up for that meeting but was later found dead in his apartment of “unknown causes” just hours prior to this meeting.
The US pharmaceutical company Abbott Laboratories acquiring Veropharm was finalized on December 12, 2014; nine months AFTER sanctions were imposed on Russia.
There was a US shell company named Kew Garden Hills, LLC which was registered in Delaware and is named after a neighborhood in Hillary Clinton’s home State of New York. This company acquired approximately 98% of Veropharm shares and then Kew Garden Hills, LLC was bought by Abbott Laboratories. A major violation involved in this unlawful financial transaction was going against international sanctions where Abbott Laboratories willfully committed a crime against US internal laws and foreign policy as well.
Interestingly, Kew Garden Hills, LLC, had no office, no board of directors, or even corporate information listed in the S&P Global Market Intelligence database. A strange fact for a firm involved in a multi-billion dollar US/foreign pharmaceutical acquisition.
Also involved was the Russian investment bank Renaissance Capital; who are noted for their having paid former President Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech he gave before top executives in Moscow.
Joseph Rago told the Russian Consulate Generals official that he had documents linking Hillary Clinton to both Abbott Laboratories and Kew Garden Hills, LLC. This obviously put the Russian Consulate office on notice. Someone working in the Russian Consulate General’s office informed someone else of this meeting.
The mysterious death of 34-year-old Joseph Rago was followed less than two weeks later by another “suicide” who was also linked to Hillary Clinton named Renwick Haddow. Mr. Haddow was a top former Haitian government official who ended up with a bullet in his head just a week prior to his testifying against Hillary Clinton in a Miami, Florida courtroom.