Many Obama Admin Officials Had Roles in Spying on Trump Campaign & Presidency
Natalieâs Commentary: It was all true, not just Hillary and her campaign officials, spying on candidate Trump then President Trump but Obamaâs administration officials were involved as well. Remember, this was a collaborative criminal process that took a great deal of clandestine plotting and acquiring the computer science researchers who would be hired as outside consultants to record and monitor many people in different locations with the worst being the Executive Office of the President.
The Department of Justice never thoroughly investigated Obama and his co-conspirators involved in the FISA Abuse Scandal. Spying on Donald J Trumpâs campaign involved wiretapping and unmasking President Trump before and after his transition into the White House.
The FISA warrants were obtained through the fake Trump dossier partially written by Christopher Steele and paid for by Hillary Clinton through Fusion GPS including attorneys Perkins Coie. John Brennan, James Comey, Rod Rosenstein, and Peter Strzok were also deeply involved in this clandestine illegal affair.
Susan Rice, Obamaâs National Security Adviser, was also involved in the FISA Abuse Scandal taking notes for Obama and his co-conspirators including his Vice President Joe Biden. Now many of Obamaâs administration including Susan Rice, the top adviser to the illegitimate President Biden on domestic and foreign policy and other related matters, admitted to participating in the wiretapping and unmasking of members of the Trump transition team.
Unmasking is the process whereby a U.S. citizenâs identity is revealed from collected surveillance.
The CIA was also involved with John Brennan as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and should have never been used to spy on its own incoming President and other government officials.
As Lee Smith, author of âThe Plot Against the Presidentâ said, âThis is an enormous national security scandal. â
Some are comparing it to Watergate because of the spying nature but is enormously much bigger. What were talking about is the Executive Office of the President. This is supposed to be one the most secure places for a President. Hillary and her campaign was spying on candidate Trump at the Trump tower, then as President in the White House.
Smith continued to point out as most Americans feel, âWeâve been living in this psyche of this deranged depraved harridan for five years and now we see, we understand even more the scope and depravity of this operation and it is terrible for the country.â
Not to mention the morale. How does it appear to our younger generations that people who were in charge of our federal government and agencies had turned on their own country, their own President. There is no respect or compassion of any kind with those who can turn against their whole country; the American people.
There has to be severe consequences for this extreme behavior for becoming a seditious treasonous knave just for money, power and control. Indictments and prosecutions must follow. If not, we are no longer a country of the rule of law nor checks and balances. We are an intelligent society where following in our founders footsteps forged a path to sustain, advance and prosper and the Constitution of the United States along with our strong faith has served us well until the corruption became insidious and billionaires thought they could call the shots for themselves, leaving out the most crucial part of this country; 335 million Americans that have worked hard to contribute to our sovereignty, national security and our strength as equal parts.Â
To further clarify the FISA Abuse Scandal please continue to read.
All this spying was an elaborate process that required almost a whole administration on board. Therefore, people closest to Obama, like Valerie Jarrett, Senior Advisor and John Podesta, former advisor to Obama and Hillaryâs Campaign Manager would have probably known how far this covert operation was going to extend and succeed. Iâm sure none of these people speculated that the shoe on the other foot would eventually come off exposing quite a few of them; especially the main players or bad actors.
At the same time, Hillaryâs campaign, Obamaâs campaign organization, and the DNC were simultaneously paying Perkins Coie, the spouse of one of Fusion GPSâs key employees was working directly for Obama in the West Wing. Shailagh Murray, a former Washington Post reporter-turned-political operative, was serving as a top communications adviser to Obama while the Obama administration was reportedly using information from the dossier to justify secret surveillance of Trump campaign staff.âÂ
Since April of 2016, Obama For America (OFA) has paid over $972,000 to Perkins Coie records filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) show. This weekendâs news confirmed all our thoughts as this saga of corruption continued to unfold. Former president Barack Obamaâs official campaign organization has directed nearly a million dollars to the same law firm that funneled money to Fusion GPS, the firm behind the infamous Steele dossier.
Six U.S. agencies created a stealth task force, spearhead by CIAâs Brennan, to run domestic surveillance on Trump associates and Trump himself. To feign ignorance and to seemingly operate within U.S. laws, the agencies freelanced the wiretapping of Trump associates to the British spy agency GCHQ. The decision to insert GCHQ as a back door to eavesdrop was sparked by the denial of two FISA Court warrant applications filed by the FBI to seek wiretaps of Trump associates.
The alt-left deep state plotters were Cabinet Secretaries; FBI Director James Comey, John Brennan (CIA), James Clapper (Director of National Intelligence), Loretta Lynch (DOJ), Jeh Johnson (DHS), Admiral Michael Rogers (NSA) and then-director of GCHQ Robert Hannigan who has since resigned from the esteemed British spy agency. The Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) is an intelligence and security organization responsible for providing signals intelligence (SIGINT) and information assurance to the government and armed forces of the United Kingdom.Â
GCHQ did not work from London or the UK. In fact, the spy agency worked from NSAâs headquarters in Fort Meade, MD with direct NSA supervision and guidance to conduct sweeping surveillance on Trump associates. The illegal wiretaps were initiated months before the controversial Trump dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.
The Justice Department and FBI set up the meeting at Trump Tower between Trump Jr., Manafort and Kushner with controversial Russian officials to make Trumpâs associates appear compromised. Following the Trump Tower sit down, GCHQ began digitally wiretapping Manafort, Trump Jr., and Kushner.
After the concocted meeting by the Deep State, the British spy agency could officially justify wiretapping Trump associates as an intelligence front for NSA because the Russian lawyer at the meeting Natalia Veselnitskaya was considered an international security risk and prior to the June sit down was not even allowed entry into the United States or the UK, federal sources said.
By using GCHQ, the NSA and its intelligence partners had carved out a loophole to wiretap Trump without a warrant. While it is illegal for U.S. agencies to monitor phones and emails of U.S. citizens inside the United States absent a warrant, it is not illegal for British intelligence to do so. The wiretaps, secured through illicit scheming, have been used by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Muellerâs probe of alleged Russian collusion in the 2016 election, even though the evidence is considered âpoisoned fruitâ. ~ Natalie
Biden Admin Officials Had Roles in Probes, Surveillance of Trump Campaign
Joe Biden constructs his new administration, individuals from the Obama administration are quietly resurfacing in positions of power. Some of these people are well known, others lesser so. But they all played critical roles at various times during the Obama administration.
Susan Rice, Obamaâs national secu rity adviser and now the âtop adviser to the president on domestic policy and related decisions,â has admitted to participating in the unmasking of members of the Trump transition team. Unmasking is the process whereby a U.S. citizenâs identity is revealed from collected surveillance.
Initially, Rice publicly denied the allegations, claiming that âI know nothing about this. I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today.â Two weeks later Rice stated that she had not done so for âfor any political purposes.â It was later reported that Rice told House investigators that âshe unmasked the identities of senior Trump officials to understand why the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates was in New York.â
Rice was also a participant in an early January 2017 meeting with President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, FBI Director James Comey, and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates where President-elect Donald Trumpâs incoming national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynnâs call with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak was discussed.
According to a filing in the Flynn legal case, notes from FBI Agent Peter Strzok revealed that âformer President Obama, James Comey, Sally Yates, Joe Biden, and apparently Susan Rice discussed the transcripts of Flynnâs calls and how to proceed against him. Mr. Obama himself directed that âthe right peopleâ investigate General Flynn.â According to Strzokâs notes, it also appears that âBiden personally raised the idea of the Logan Actâ that would initially be used to pursue Flynn.
Rice, whose level of participation in the spying on the Trump 2016 campaign is still not fully known, sent herself an email on Obamaâs last day in office detailing events that took place during this meeting. In addition to Flynn, Rice also noted that Obama asked his team to be âmindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully [with the incoming Trump team] as it relates to Russia.â
MOST READ
Meanwhile, Samantha Power has been named as administrator, U.S. Agency for International Development. Her position has not yet been confirmed. Power was the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations in the Obama administration. According to a July 27, 2017, letter to then-Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) noted that âone official, whose position had no apparent intelligence related function, made hundreds of unmasking requests during the final year of the Obama administration.â That official was later identified in the media as Power. For her part, Power has denied that she was the person making the unmasking requests.
In addition to the better-known names from the Obama administration, there are other lesser-known members of the new Biden administration who had played roles, sometimes crucial ones, in the surveillance of the Trump transition team.
Acting Deputy AG John Carlin
John Carlin, currently the acting deputy attorney general, is involved in the DOJâs investigation into the events of Jan. 6 at the U.S. capital. Carlin recently confirmed that more than three hundred people have been charged in relation to the events on Jan. 6 and more than two hundred and eighty have been arrested. Carlin told reporters on Feb. 26 that the investigation is âmoving at a speed and scale that is unprecedented.â Earlier in his career, Carlin was the deputy chief of staff and counselor to then-FBI Director Robert Mueller, who would later be appointed as special counsel during the Trump administration.
During the Obama administration, Carlin was the assistant attorney general for national security and head of the DOJâs National Security Division (NSD) from April 2014 through October 2016 and was involved in the FBIâs Crossfire Hurricane investigation of the Trump campaign.
According to testimony by FBI lawyer Lisa Page, Carlin was receiving briefings on both the Clinton and the Trump investigations directly from FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. Page testified that Carlin âwas kept abreast of the sort of investigative activity that was going onâ and said that âCarlin might call over to Andy McCabe, and sort of make his teamâs pitch.â As part of this process, Carlin was receiving briefings on the progress of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application on Trump campaign aide Carter Page.
This likely wasnât the first time Carlin heard about Carter Page. In March 11, 2016, Carlin and Preet Bharara, the United States attorney for the southern district of New York, released a joint statement noting the guilty plea of Evgeny Buryakov, a Russian Intelligence officer convicted of spying. Carter Page had assisted in this investigation and had met with the FBI on the matter on March 2, 2016. Carlinâs knowledge of Carter Pageâs previous assistance to the FBI suggests he would have known Carter Page was not a Russian agent. This, however, did not impede the FBIâs efforts to obtain a FISA warrant on Carter Page on Oct. 21, 2016.
Despite Carlinâs involvement in the Carter Page FISA and the earlier espionage case in which Carter Page had assisted, Carlin stated that his recollection of Carter Page and the FBIâs FISA application on Carter Page was limited when he was interviewed in July 2017 by the House Select Committee on Intelligence.
When asked by then-Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) if he had participated in any FISA application related to Carter Page, Carlin stated âI believeâI believe I did. Thereâs been so much public reporting since I left, but I remember being involved in the preparation of the FISA application for an individual that was related to the Trump campaign.â Carlin told Gowdy that âI remember there was one application. I donât remember whether or not I actually signed it.â
As head of the DOJâs NSD, Carlin also maintained oversight of the intelligence agenciesâ use of Section 702 authority. The NSD and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) jointly conduct reviews of the intelligence agenciesâ Section 702 activities every 60 days and the NSD is required to report any incidents of agency noncompliance or misconduct to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).
Additionally, the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) are required by Section 702 to provide the FISC with annual certifications and show that Intelligence Community agencies are following targeting and minimization procedures that are approved by the FISC. These annual certifications are filed by the NSD.
A Jan. 7, 2016, report by National Security Agency (NSA) Inspector General George Ellard disclosed a fundamental issue that appeared to cause issues with oversight of Section 702 data. Ellard noted that the methodology that the DOJ and NSD âhave agreed on does not include providing all records of queries performed.â Furthermore, the IG report also found that âcontrols for monitoring query compliance have not been completely developedâ and there was âno process to reliably identify queriesâ being performed.
The Jan. 7, 2016, IG report notes that the âNSAâs Office of General Counsel (OGC) notified DOJ NSD of the FISA incidents.â However, it does not appear that the NSD ever disclosed the IG report to the FISC.
In addition to the IG findings, on March 9, 2016, âDOJ oversight personnel conducting a minimization review at the FBIâs [redacted] learned that the FBI had disclosed raw FISA informationâ to an undisclosed entity. In an April 2017 ruling, the FISC noted that this unknown division or center was âlargely staffed by private contractorsâ and that these contractors âhad access to raw FISA information on FBI storage systems.â
The Court also stated that the contractorâs access to raw FISA data appears to have been the âresult of deliberate decision makingâ and the access to FBI systems âwas the subject of an interagency memorandum of understandingâ that had been âprepared or reviewed by FBI lawyers.â Despite this pre-existing multi-agency agreement, âno notice of this practice was given to the FISC until 2016.â
The NSAâs IG report combined with the discoveries on March 9, 2016, prompted an internal compliance review instigated by then-NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers. On Oct. 24, 2016, Rogers verbally informed the FISA court of the findings from his investigation, which the FISC found to include âsignificant noncompliance with the NSAâs minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers.â
The court noted that the âfull scope of non-compliant querying practices had not been previously disclosed to the Courtâ and that preliminary results from additional reviews suggested that âthe problem was widespread during all periods under review.â
Carlin had filed the governmentâs proposed 2016 Section 702 certifications on Sept. 26, 2016, but did not disclose the Jan. 7, 2016, IG report to the FISA court. Additionally, it appears that the court was again not notified of the IG report during an Oct. 4, 2016, follow-up hearing.
In its April 2017 ruling, the âthe Court ascribed the governmentâs failure to disclose those IG and OCO reviews at the October 4, 2016 hearing to an institutional âlack of candor.ââ
On Sept. 27, 2016, the day after he filed the annual certifications, Carlin announced his resignation from the DOJ, which would become effective on Oct. 15, 2016. At this time, the FBIâs application of the Carter Page FISA was nearing completion. On Oct. 21, 2016, the DOJ and FBI obtained a FISA warrant on Carter Page. At this point, the FISA court still was unaware of the Section 702 violations.
Victoria Nuland
Biden recently announced that he nominated Victoria Nuland as âundersecretary of state for political affairsââthe third-highest ranking post at the State Department. Nuland has a lengthy history in the State Department and played several roles during the FBIâs investigation of the Trump campaign.
Sometime in the latter half of 2014, Christopher Steele, author of the infamous dossier at the center of the Russia probe, began to informally provide reports he had prepared for a private client to the State Department. One of the recipients of the reports was Victoria Nuland, who was then the assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs.
On July 5, 2016, FBI agent Michael Gaeta traveled to London and met with Steele at the offices of Steeleâs firm, Orbis. At some point in early July, Steeleâs early dossier reports were passed to Nuland and the State Departmentâpossibly through Jonathan Winer, then a State Department official who was friends with Steele, perhaps through Gaeta or possibly through Steele himself.
During an interview, Nuland said that âin the middle of July, when he [Steele] was doing this other work and became concernedâŚhe passed two to four pages of short points of what he was finding and our immediate reaction to that was, this is not in our purview. This needs to go to the FBI if there is any concern here that one candidate or the election as a whole might be influenced by the Russian Federation.â Nuland later said these documents were passed on at some point to both the FBI and Secretary of State John Kerry.
Nuland was later briefed on the larger Steele dossier during a meeting with an associate of Sen. John McCain, David Kramer, in December 2016. Kramer said that McCain instructed him to meet with Nuland and Russian Affairs Director Celeste Wallander. The purpose of the meeting was to verify whether the dossier âwas being taken seriously.â Kramer said he didnât physically share the dossier with them at this point, but met again with Wallander, a National Security Council member, âaround New Yearsâ and âgave her a copy of the document.â
01.02.14.24.121