ABC The Powerhouse Rountable on the Clintons: ©Natalie Keshing
Hillary and Bill Clinton were the subject at the last White House Correspondence dinner. It was repeatedly joked about the Clinton Foundation and their donations. Here are a couple of excerpts:
President Obama: “For many Americans this is still a time of deep uncertainty. For example I have one friend who just a few weeks ago she was making millions of dollars a year and she is now living out of a van in Iowa.” (the audience laughing)
Cecily Strong’s: “In Tom Patton’s defense, he was just trying to repair America’s strained relationship with Israel, but you know he doesn’t have to worry about that, our relationship will be better in the next administration just as soon as Israel makes a generous donation to the Clinton Foundation.” (the audience laughing)
The saddest part of this entire cover-up is not taking what the Clintons did seriously enough and prosecuting them. It’s not funny that the Clintons engaged in lucrative deal making between oligarchs (ruthless dictators) in Africa with foreign donors and rich company executives to steal billions of dollars from the African people, the men, women, and most heartbreaking the children of Africa. The profits that came from the rich mineral deposits in Africa belong to the people of Africa. Now billions of dollars that were made out of illegal lucrative deals between the Clintons, Oligarchs, foreign governments, and rich executives of large companies are in secret bank accounts around the world. Remember the Panama Papers!
When this case does come to trial, the people of Africa should be represented by reputable lawyers of the highest standards to sue the Clintons, foreign national governments, and the executives of rich companies; those who profited from these illegal lucrative deals except for the men, women, and children of Africa. The Oligarchs (ruthless warlords) should be put in prison. What we have here is the Clintons deal making with criminals against the Constitution. It explicitly states in the Constitution of the United States, “You cannot take money from foreign governments without explicit permission from Congress.” This was specifically written to prevent the danger of corrupting our government system by foreign money donations now donated to the Clinton Foundation.
George Stephanopoulos from the ABC News The Powerhouse Roundtable said, “Mr. Speaker you thought that these allegations are starting to reach a critical mass. It could even force Hillary Clinton out of the race. What do you make of the Peter Schweizer’s allegations regarding the undisclosed donations to the Clinton Foundations from foreign donors.”
Donna Brazile Chairperson of the Democratic National Committee said, “Look what the campaign needs to do is to just go ahead and respond to these allegations, their scurrilous and we’re going to see more of them as the campaign goes along and reach out to the voters and ignore all of this background noise. That’s what they need to do.”
Speaker Newt Gingrich said, “This isn’t a political problem this is a historical problem. The Constitution of the United States says, “You cannot take money from foreign governments without explicit permission from Congress.” They wrote that in there because they knew the danger of corrupting our system by foreign money is enormous. You had a sitting Secretary of State whose husband radically increased his speech fees. “You have a whole series of dots on the wall now where people gave millions of dollars oh by they happened to be taken care of by the State Department, now you raised a good standard.” Of course having been on the Watergate committee Hillary Clinton knew exactly what to do, she eliminated 33,000 emails, Richard Nixon only erased 18 minutes. You’re going to have a prima facie case any jury would look at. I think the jury would look at the totality of this case and say it is clearly against the Constitution, it is clearly against US law, DOD and HSS both have rules you can’t take more than $315.00 dollars.
Mark Halperin Co-Managing Editor of Bloomberg Politics said, “It’s extraordinarily serious. Imagine if an assistant Secretary of State had done what Hillary Clinton we know that she did, they’d be out of the State Department. Co-mingling a family donation, donations from foreign governments, increased speech fees and government actions. There were government actions taken, what we don’t know and this goes to the deleted emails is what kind of communication did Hillary Clinton have on her private email account regarding her husband’s speeches and regarding the foundation activities that involved foreign donations. If they hadn’t been so careless at the foundation, if she hadn’t deleted the emails and if they put somebody out in the the show today to answer these questions, I think a lot of this could be put to rest but none of those things are true or happening.”
Speaker Newt Gingrich said, “The Constitution said you can’t take this money. We have federal laws that say “You can’t take this money”. If this was any other person than Hillary Clinton they would be under indictment right now for clearly a straight forward problem. My point is they took money from foreign governments while she was Secretary of State that is clearly illegal. This is not about politics,”It’s illegal!” And it’s dangerous to America to have foreign governments who get into the habit of bribing people who happen to be the husband of the Secretary of State or the next President of the United States. The Constitution says, “You can’t take this money. They took money from foreign governments that is illegal and it is dangerous for foreign governments to think they can get away with this.”
Mark Halperin Co-Managing Editor of Bloomberg Politics said, “Here’s why you know this is serious because any (almost) any democrat who is not on the Clintons payroll will tell the reporters privately “These are serious issues” forget the politics “This are serious issues” the question for me right now, is all these donors who gave and all the people who paid President Clinton to give speeches what kind of communications do they have with the people in the government (raising more and deeper issues ©Natalie Keshing). That may not be a quid pro quo (a favor or advantage granted or expected in return for something). But everybody knows that a lot of those donations were for people who wanted access to the Clintons.”
John Howman, Executive Profile & Biography Businessweek – Bloomberg said, “Barack Obama’s administration knew this was a potential problem, that’s why they set up the agreement that they had with the family, Hillary and Bill Clinton when Hillary Clinton took the job as Secretary of State. “There are now several documented instances whether or not it is illegal, whether they broke their agreement with the administration.” When you think about the President having the standard of being the most transparent and open administration in history, what the Clinton’s have done here is clearly not the most transparent and they violated the spirit of Barack Obama’s presidency.”
Hillary Clinton’s unfavorable and untrustworthy polls are up to 70%. I don’t think we have to wonder why? It’s evident and transparent what she chose to do with her husband Bill Clinton and for the world to watch (WITNESS) all the while thinking, “Is she going to get away without paying the price for her deplorable unethical behavior?” Does she feel sorry for the children of Africa that she purposely and intentionally stole from. She leaves nothing to the imagination for those who already questioned her trustworthiness.